Email List news Forum 登出 是会员,在这登录 推荐给你的朋友 使用自由媒体指南 有问题?问我们 多种中文输入法 影视,录影 照片图像 谈天说地 文章/新闻 免费注册会员 首页
Custom Search
Free Car Ads
The following lines were printed in raw mode by module, however this should not happen. The module is probably directly calling functions like echo, print, or printf. Please modify the module to exclude direct output. The module is violating Xaraya architecture principles.


Notice: Undefined index: date in /home/tian0509/public_html/modules/articles/xaruser/display.php on line 640


This is the real module output:

文件
使用手册
Browse in : All > 文件 > 使用手册
版主/坛主/斑竹申请
(2164 Reads )


(每个版面通常设置2名版主)

版主来自活跃的网民,版主的工作是服务网民,给网友带来快乐的同时也给自己带来快乐和提升,而不是一种权力的象征。

基本条件:
1。活跃的网民、
2。愿意热心服务网友、
3。必须尊重言论自由,既赞同以下声明:
“我虽然极不同意您的观点,但我尊重您的言论自由的权利。”

版主是自愿申请的,版主必须尊重言论自由、应该是诚实守信、乐于助人、大公无私的表率。版主需要有较多的上网时间管理版务,引导网友发帖参与。同时还要熟悉相关版面专业及常用网络知识。在所申请的版面已经发有一定数量的好贴,经验丰富,在网友中有良好的口碑。

版主职责和权限:
1.    主持和带动讨论。积极发贴并引导网友发帖,领导版块走向
2.    促进自由和健康的讨论风气,确保言论在本论坛自由无阻
3.    确保本论坛不被公器私用,如沦为商业广告宣传的场所
4.    对网友进行必要的技术指导
5.    及时将精华好贴设为顶项

若版主定下有违言论自由精神之条文,版主职权自动解除。

坛主日常运作请参考:坛主须知

有意者,请在民意堂 自荐/推荐,也可联络:
info@thefreemedia.com

《自由媒体》《哈哈赛!》启



< prev     next >

All information provided, shall be the sole responsibility of the person providing the Content or the person whose user account is used. You agree that our web site may expose you to Content that may be objectionable or offensive. We shall not be responsible to you in any way for the Content that appears on this web site nor for any error or omission.... Read more on Terms of Use

Note: Comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for their content.

版主/坛主/斑竹申请

贴者: 哈哈熊 @ 6189 on 四月 24, 2006 10:03 下午

我想申请《中台统独论坛》的斑竹,可以吗?

#

版主/坛主/斑竹申请

贴者: 周本兴 @ 5656 on 五月 06, 2006 12:37 下午

不知可否義務貢獻棉力﹐義務成為法律顧問﹖

#

Re: 版主/坛主/斑竹申请

贴者: 匿名 @ 2 on 五月 06, 2006 10:23 下午

成為法律顧問﹖还是法律坛主?

#

版主/坛主/斑竹申请

贴者: 管理人[陈利威] @ 3964 on 五月 06, 2006 09:39 下午

目前,网站的法律问题,到底是怎样状况呢?可以使用平常的法律控告网站吗?怎样的案例呢?

这个建议很有前瞻性,让我们讨论看看。

#

版主/坛主/斑竹申请

贴者: 周本兴 @ 5656 on 五月 07, 2006 02:04 下午

根據案例﹐網上的譭謗可以在誹謗法令下被起訴。
PETROLIAM NASIONAL BHD (PETRONAS) & ORS V. KHOO NEE KIONG
HIGH COURT MALAYA, PULAU PINANG
SU GEOK YIAM JC
[CIVIL SUIT NO: 22-623-2001]
5 JULY 2003

CIVIL PROCEDURE:Injunction - Interim injunction - To restrain publication of defamatory email and statements on the internet - Whether defendant sufficiently identified - Whether defendant the registrant and operator of impugned websites - Whether impugned email was sent by defendant - Whether impugned email and statements were defamatory - Whether plaintiffs suffered damage - Whether interim prohibitory injunctions should be granted
CIVIL PROCEDURE:Injunction - Interim injunction - To restrain passing off of internet domain names - Whether there was a serious issue to be tried - Whether defendant falsely represented that his company was associated with plaintiffs' company - Whether impugned domain names were instruments of fraud the use of which resulted in passing off - Whether interim prohibitory injunctions should be granted
EVIDENCE:Documentary evidence - Documents produced by computer - Application by plaintiffs for interim injunction to restrain defendant from publishing defamatory email and statements - Whether mandatory for plaintiffs to exhibit certificate under s. 90A Evidence Act 1950for computer printouts containing allegedly defamatory email and statements - Whether plaintiffs had to establish prima facie case or only show bona fide serious question to be tried - Whether deponent of plaintiffs' affidavit-in-support had personal knowledge of its contents - Whether disputed by defendant in affidavit-in-reply
TORT:Defamation - Libel - Electronic publication - Internet - Application for interim injunction to restrain publication of defamatory email and statements on the internet - Whether defendant sufficiently identified - Whether impugned email and statements were defamatory and untrue - Whether plaintiffs suffered damage
TRADEMARKS:Passing off - Internet domain names - Whether an intellectual property - Application for interim injunction to restrain passing off of internet domain names - Whether there was a serious issue to be tried - Whether defendant falsely represented that his company was associated with plaintiffs' company - Whether impugned domain names were instruments of fraud the use of which resulted in passing off

This was an inter partesapplication by the plaintiffs (Petroliam Nasional Berhad (PETRONAS), Petronas Dagangan Berhad and Petronas Gas Berhad) for interim prohibitory and mandatory injunctions to: (i) restrain the defendant from dealing in or passing off any internet domain names that contain the word 'petronas'; (ii) restrain the defendant from publishing or posting certain statements ('the impugned email') which the plaintiffs considered defamatory; and (iii) compel the defendant to transfer the domain name 'petronasgas.com' to the plaintiffs.

The defendant was an individual carrying on business as a sole proprietor under the trade name Araneum Consulting Services. The plaintiffs contended that the defendant had registered the domain names 'petronas-dagangan.com', 'petronasgas.com', 'mypetronasdagangan.com' and 'mypetronas.com' and was offering them for sale viathe email address 'araneum@email.com'. It was contended that the defendant also maintained a website called 'Search Malaysia' at the url www.petronasgas.com. The plaintiffs further contended that the webpages of 'Search Malaysia', which were also accessible viathe url www.searchmalaysia.com, had described 'petronasgas.com' as a subsidiary of 'searchmalaysia.com'.

The plaintiffs thus submitted that the defendant had misrepresented to the public and the business world that the websites operated by the defendant under or linked to domain names that incorporated the word 'petronas' were maintained or authorised by and/or connected to the plaintiffs; and that the defendant and his business were connected to or associated with the plaintiffs and/or that the products and services of the defendant were connected to or associated with the products and services of the plaintiffs or, alternatively, originated from or were those of the plaintiffs. It was the plaintiffs' case that this deception had caused confusion in the business world and amongst the public, as a consequence of which they suffered damage.

Held (allowing the application):

[1]The plaintiffs had shown that the name in the impugned email was that of the defendant, that the defendant was the sole proprietor of Araneum Consulting Services, and that both the websites www.petronasgas.com and www.searchmalaysia.com were operated by Araneum Consulting Services. They had also shown that the reliable search engine 'better-whois.com' yielded search results which indicated that either the defendant or Araneum Consulting Services was the registrant of the domain names 'petronas-dagangan.com', 'petronasgas.com', 'mypetronasdagangan.com' and 'mypetronas.com'. From the evidence, the defendant was most probably the person who had set up the websites www.petronasgas.com and www.searchmalaysia.com and sent the impugned email. Hence, the plaintiffs had sufficiently identified the defendant for the purpose of the injunctive relief they sought. (pp 318 e-g, 319 a-h, 320 a-g, 321 a-b & 323 b-c)

[2]It was notmandatory for the plaintiffs to exhibit a certificate (pursuant to s. 90A of the Evidence Act 1950) in respect of the computer printouts containing the impugned email and statements. The plaintiffs only had to show a bona fideserious question to be tried at this stage of the proceedings; they did not have to establish a prima faciecase. The deponent of the plaintiffs' affidavit-in-support had deposed that the contents of the affidavit were within his personal knowledge; and this was not challenged or disputed by the defendant in his affidavit-in-reply. (pp 324 d-f, 325 h & 326 a)

[3]The impugned email and statements were manifestly defamatory and obviously untrue. Their natural and ordinary and inferential meanings were, inter alia, that the plaintiffs had no lawful claim to domain names that contain the word 'petronas'; that they were oppressive, intimidating and extortionate to other local businesses; and that they were high-handed, arrogant, ignorant, incompetent and like robbers. The impugned email and statements were calculated to injure and disparage the plaintiffs' reputation, lower them in the estimation of right-thinking members of society, and bring them into public scandal, odium and contempt. The plaintiffs had also shown that the impugned email and statements were published to ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers), at www.petronasgas.com and www.searchmalaysia.com, and on the prominent Malaysian newsgroup 'soc.culture.malaysia'. The plaintiffs had suffered irreparable loss and damage, and grave injury to their trading personality and reputation. Hence, the interim prohibitory injunctions sought should be granted to restrain the defendant from further defaming the plaintiffs on the internet or elsewhere. (pp 328 g-h, 329 a-h, 330 a-g & 331 a-d)

[4]By registering domain names that contain the word 'petronas', a serious issue to be tried had arisen as to whether the defendant was making the false representation that Araneum Consulting Services was connected to or associated with the plaintiffs or was the owner of the goodwill in the name PETRONAS (the statutory acronym for Petroleum Nasional Berhad). Further, the said domain names were instruments of fraud and any realistic use of them as domain names would result in passing off. Hence, the interim prohibitory injunctions sought should be granted to restrain the defendant from passing off any domain names that contain the word 'petronas'. (pp 335 g-h & 336 a-d)

[5]The plaintiffs' prayer for an interim mandatory injunction had become irrelevant. This was because the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center had, upon hearing the plaintiffs complaint, ordered the domain name 'petronasgas.com' to be transferred to the plaintiffs. (p 314 a-c)

[Plaintiffs' application allowed; interim prohibitory injunctions issued.]

#





发表回应 | 發表囬應

免费注册会员 | 忘了密码? | 注册面对问题?

网友回应
Today
冬天的牛 > 中国汉字2110年发扬光大
冬天的牛 > Re(1): 冠英与回教徒齐宰牛侮辱回教? 槟州...
msian > 内阁成员供词左右自贸区弊案 林良实感激马...
敦符国荣博士 > 中国汉字2110年发扬光大
八孔生烟 > Re: 冠英与回教徒齐宰牛侮辱回教? 槟州民...
八孔生烟 > Re: 中国汉字2110年发扬光大
大盗苦苦叫 > 中国汉字2110年发扬光大
冬天的牛 > 中国汉字2110年发扬光大
冬天的牛 > 冠英与回教徒齐宰牛侮辱回教? 槟州民联报...
老样子 > 援助本地貧困孩童
八孔生烟 > Re: 中国汉字2110年发扬光大
大盗苦苦叫 > 中国汉字2110年发扬光大
网龙 > 鄭丁賢‧明志與茜蒂
网龙 > 哈哈哈哈 !盲蛙笑井底蛙观天。
网龙 > 黄明志何错之有?
Yesterday
懒人不懒 > Re: 黄明志何错之有?
lptan > 2008!每个【华人】必读的一篇文章!
张阳熠 > 哈哈哈哈 !盲蛙笑井底蛙观天。
张阳熠 > 中国汉字2110年发扬光大
八孔生烟 > 中国汉字2110年发扬光大
网龙 > 中国汉字2110年发扬光大
敦符国荣博士 > 中国汉字2110年发扬光大
八孔生烟 > 中国汉字2110年发扬光大
周芝简 > 中国汉字2110年发扬光大
msian > Re(2): 马华公会欠黄明志一个公道
明天 > Re(1): 马华公会欠黄明志一个公道
msian > 黄明志何错之有?
黄志权 > Re: 马华公会欠黄明志一个公道
msian > 马华公会欠黄明志一个公道
Two days ago
冬天的牛 > Re: 马华公会欠黄明志一个公道

Older comments

控制台



免费会员注册 忘了密码? | 注册出问题?
自由媒体首页 | 网誌 | 影视 | 千言图 | 不正经论坛 | 闲话家常 | 性论坛 | 恋情越界 | 恋爱论坛 | 性别论坛 | 单身贵族 | 妈妈经 爸爸经 | 办公室越界 | 时尚品味 | 鬼神论坛 | 笑话论坛 | 旅游论坛 | 娱乐八卦 | 影话蒙太奇 | 文学论坛:文学现象 | 书香世界 | 音乐论坛 | 原创论坛 | 文化论坛 | 数码论坛 | 科技时尚产品 | 电脑门诊 | 电玩游戏越界 | 跨国议题 | 中台统獨论壇 | 中美论坛 | 中日论坛 | 新马论坛 | 中国前途论坛 | 台灣論壇 | 香港論壇2046 | 马来西亚论坛 | 新加坡论坛 | 商机越界 | 大专生论坛 | 海外留学生论坛 | 升学论坛 | 媒体观察论坛 | 人权论坛 | 吉隆坡虚拟社区 | 槟城虚拟社区 | 新山虚拟社区 | 怡保虚拟社区 | 询问处 | 体育论坛 | 座右铭 | 佳肴美食菜谱
当今大马(马)| 独立新闻(马)| 风云时报(马)| 佳礼论坛(马)| 东方日报(马)| 星洲日报(马)| 光明日报(马)| 中国报(马)| 南洋商报(马)| 988(马)| MyFM(马)| 大红花的国度(马)| 光华日报(马)| 凤凰网(中)| 雅虎(中)| 搜狐| 网易| 新浪网| 中华网| 人民日报(中)| 东方网(中)| 中新网(中)| 金羊网(中)| 自由时报(台)| 中时电子报(台)| 联合新闻网(台)| 东森新闻报(台)| 明报(港)| 苹果日报(港) | 文汇报(港)| 亚洲时报| 联合早报(新)| 亚洲新闻网(新)| Malaysiakini| MsiaInsider| Aliran| MsiaToday| TheEdge| TheStar| | Google| Yahoo| Al Jazeera| Asia Times| BBC| Bloomberg| CNN| Guardian| HeraldTribune| Reuters| MovieWeb| Discovery